Reliability Enhancement of Electric Submersible Pumps in Oil Fields: A Comparative Study of Predictive and Reactive Maintenance Using Survival Analysis and Weibull Models

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Petroleum and Geoenergy Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Petroleum and Geoenergy Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Chemical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Electrical Submersible Pumps (ESPs) are widely used to sustain oil production in mature and challenging reservoirs; however, their frequent failures often lead to production deferment, costly workovers, and reduced operational efficiency. This study presents a comparative evaluation of predictive maintenance (PM) and reactive maintenance for ESP systems using 50 case studies from diverse reservoirs and operating conditions. Reliability performance was assessed using mean time between failures (MTBF), mean time to failure (MTTF), failure rate, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and Weibull probability modeling. The economic impact of maintenance strategy was also evaluated through failure-related costs and deferred production losses.

The results indicate that PM consistently enhances ESP reliability by extending operational run life and reducing failure occurrence. Median survival increased from approximately 400 days before PM implementation to about 750 days after PM adoption, while Weibull analysis showed a shift from early random failures toward more predictable wear-out behavior. Economic evaluation further demonstrated that PM reduces workover frequency and production-loss exposure, yielding estimated cost savings of approximately 30–40% across the analyzed cases, even after accounting for monitoring and diagnostic investments.

This study contributes to the ESP reliability literature by providing an integrated comparison of predictive and reactive maintenance using survival analysis, Weibull modeling, and economic assessment within a unified framework across multiple field cases. The findings confirm that predictive maintenance is both technically effective and economically justified, and they highlight the value of combining advanced monitoring, reliability analytics, and data-driven maintenance planning to improve ESP performance and reduce life-cycle costs in oilfield operations.

Highlights

·       A comparative evaluation of predictive and reactive maintenance strategies was conducted for electric submersible pump (ESP) systems using 50 field case studies.

·       Predictive maintenance significantly increased ESP run life, mean time between failures (MTBF), and survival probability across diverse operating conditions.

·       Weibull and Kaplan–Meier models were applied to quantify failure behavior and improvements in post-maintenance reliability.

·       An integrated reliability index combining MTBF, survival probability, and economic performance increased from 0.45 to 0.78 following the implementation of predictive maintenance (PM).

·       Predictive maintenance reduced workover frequency, deferred production losses, and overall failure-related costs by approximately 30–40%.

·       The study provides an integrated technical and economic framework for ESP reliability assessment and maintenance planning.

·       The proposed workflow can be extended to other artificial lift systems in digital oilfield applications.

Keywords

Subjects

Abdalla, R., Samara, H., Perozo, N., Carvajal, C. P., and Jaeger, P. T., Machine learning approach for predictive maintenance of the electrical submersible pumps (ESPS), ACS Omega, Vol. 7, No. 21, p. 17641–17651, 2022.
Al-Ballam, S., Karami, H., and Devegowda, D., A data-based reliability analysis of ESP failures in oil production wells, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Vol. 4, No. 4, p. 1–29, 2022.
Al-Hejjaj, M. A., Sadeq, D. J., and Al-Fatlawi, O., A review of the electrical submersible pump development chronology, International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, Vol. 24, No. 2, p. 123–135, 2023.
Al-Jazzaf, A. M., Pandit, A., and Al-Maqsseed, N., Interpretation of ESP reliability using Weibull analysis and dynamic run life analysis, SPE Gulf Coast Section Electric Submersible Pumps Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2019.
Al-Sadah, H., ESP Data Analysis to Enhance Electrical Submersible Pump Run Life at Saudi Arabian Fields, SPE Middle East Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2014.
Alsaeedi, K., Abdelkerim, A., Al Radhi, M., Alhammadi, A., and Alqaydi, M., Enhancing ESP Reliability with Real-Time Analytics & AI Predictive to Extend Run Life, SPE Gulf Coast Section Electric Submersible Pumps Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2025.
Bhering, F. L., Pereira, C. A. B., and Polpo, A., Reliability estimators for the components of series and parallel systems: The Weibull model, arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.5252, 2013.
Cardona, L., Vivas Sanchez, P., and Joya, B., Failure prediction methodology for ESP and operational behavior, SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2023.
Doorsamy, W., Condition Monitoring of Electric Machines: Modern Frameworks and Data-Driven Methodologies, Machines, Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 144, 2025.
Fakher, S., Khlaifat, A., Hossain, M. E., and Nameer, H., Rigorous review of electrical submersible pump failure mechanisms and their mitigation measures, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, Vol. 11, No. 10, p. 3799–3814, 2021.
Fakhrolmobasheri, A., Artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques and big data methods and tools in the oil and gas industry, Technical Report / Working Paper, 2023.
Foresti, B., Viana, A., Bacellar, F., Silva, J., Neves, M., Ribeiro, M., Oliveira, P., Costa, B., Cemin, D., and Sousa, C., ESP Testing: A Key Role in Enhancing Reliability, SPE Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition-Americas, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2024.
Garcia, J., Rios-Colque, L., Peña, A., and Rojas, L., Condition monitoring and predictive maintenance in industrial equipment: An NLP-assisted review of signal processing, hybrid models, and implementation challenges, Applied Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 10, p. 5465, 2025.
Khalili, Y., Ahmadi, M., and Moraveji, M. K., A comprehensive review of failure modes in electrical submersible pumps: Diagnosis, predictive maintenance, and engineer’s guide, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, p. 1–22, 2025.
Khalili, Y., Ahmadi, M., and Moraveji, M. K., Time-aware predictive maintenance of electrical submersible pumps using CatBoost ensemble learning and trend-based labeling, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, Vol. 15, No. 9, p. 1–24, 2025.
Khalili, Y., Rafiei, Y., and Sharifi, M., Reservoir Characterization by Applying Pressure Transient Analysis on Data Obtained from Electrical Submersible Pumps, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2022.
Khuntia, S. R., Zghal, F., Bhuyan, R., Schenkel, E., Duvivier, P., Blancke, O., and Krasny, W., Use of survival analysis and simulation to improve maintenance planning of high voltage instrument transformers in the Dutch transmission system, World Congress on Engineering Asset Management, Springer, p. 745–754, 2022.
Kuiper, M., Trindade, M., De Almeida, E., Guimaraes, C., Kinnear, C., Garcia, G., and Hope, A., Improvements and Critical Success Factors for ESP Deployments, SPE Gulf Coast Section Electric Submersible Pumps Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2025.
Li, Z., Fu, H., and Guo, J., Reliability Assessment of a Series System with Weibull-Distributed Components Based on Zero-Failure Data, Applied Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 5, p. 2869, 2025.
Mohamed, A. S., El-Sayed, S. K., and Mohamed, I. S., A Statistical Framework for Survival Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Electrical Submersible Pumps, Geoenergy Science and Engineering, Vol. 246, p. 213993, 2025.
Nwulu, E. O., Elete, T. Y., Erhueh, O. V., Akano, O. A., and Omomo, K. O., Leveraging predictive modelling to enhance equipment reliability: A generic approach for the oil and gas industry, International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, Vol. 20, No. 11, p. 951–969, 2024.
Omisola, J. O., Etukudoh, E. A., Okenwa, O. K., Olugbemi, G. I. T., and Ogu, E., Future Directions in Advanced Instrumentation for the Oil and Gas Industry: A Conceptual Analysis, Engineering Science & Technology Journal, Vol. 5, No. 3, p. 892–906, 2024.
Rabbitt, R., and Chacin, J., Development and Implementation of an Automated ESP Failure Database and Reliability Analysis Platform, SPE Gulf Coast Section Electric Submersible Pumps Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2021.
Saputra, M., Rahmanto, B., Anggaraini, H., and Ryanta, A., Enhancing Reliability and Emissions Reduction: The Impact of Compact Wide Range Electrical Submersible Pumps, International Petroleum Technology Conference, IPTC, 2025.
Shishlyannikov, D., Ustinova, Y., and Kartavtsev, V., Enhancing the Reliability of Electric Submersible Pumps in Challenging Operating Environments Using Advanced Engineering Solutions, International Journal of Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 1, p. 88–97, 2027.
Sobhy, M. A., Detecting Electrical Submersible Pump (ESP) Failures and Estimating Run Life Using Artificial Neural Networks, SPE Conference Paper / Technical Report, 2025.
Song, Y., Jun, S., Nguyen, T. C., and Wang, J., Experimental data-driven model development for ESP failure diagnosis based on the principal component analysis, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, Vol. 14, No. 6, p. 1521–1537, 2024.
Takacs, G., Electrical submersible pumps manual: design, operations, and maintenance, Gulf Professional Publishing, 2017.
Werbinska-Wojciechowska, S., and Rogowski, R., Proactive Maintenance of Pump Systems Operating in the Mining Industry—A Systematic Review, Sensors, Vol. 25, No. 8, p. 2365, 2025.
Xu, Z., Analysis of common failure causes and optimization suggestions of ESP, Advances in Geology and Resources Exploration, CRC Press, p. 912–918, 2022.
 
 
 
 

  • Receive Date 22 November 2025
  • Revise Date 28 June 2026
  • Accept Date 25 July 2026