Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Ideal Binary Distillation through Dynamic Process Intensification

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 1 MS, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 2 PhD, Gas Engineering Department, Ahvaz Faculty of Petroleum Engineering, Petroleum University of Technology (PUT), Ahvaz, Iran

10.22050/ijogst.2025.469181.1713
Abstract
This study examines and optimizes operational strategies in distillation units. Given rising energy costs, limited energy resources, and increasing environmental constraints, improving the energy efficiency of process industries has become critically important. This research aims to enhance the performance of distillation units by implementing dynamic process intensification, which involves alternating between two operational points with different concentrations. The study evaluates the use of Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controllers and Model Predictive Control (MPC) to improve the efficiency of distillation columns. The results show that MPC controllers markedly enhance distillation performance compared to PID controllers. The findings further indicate that optimal periodic operation between the two operational points requires identifying the specific points and the time intervals during which the system should operate in each mode. This research demonstrates that using PID and MPC controllers to manage concentration transitions between operational points can dynamically improve the distillation of methanol and 1-propanol mixtures. As a result, energy savings of approximately 1.5% and 4.5% in the reboiler duty of the distillation column can be achieved without compromising product quality or throughput. Simulations performed in Aspen software validate these outcomes and underscore the positive effects of dynamic process intensification on distillation performance (Kister et al., 1992; Smith 2005).

Highlights

·       Dynamic process intensification is implemented in an ideal binary distillation column.

·       Periodic operation between auxiliary operating points leads to a reduction in reboiler energy consumption.

·       Nonlinear steady-state behavior enables energy savings without compromising product quality.

·       Model predictive control (MPC) outperforms conventional PID control in managing dynamic transitions.

·       A reduction of up to 4.5% in reboiler duty is achieved through the application of MPC.

Keywords

Subjects

Astrom, K.J., PID controllers: theory, design, and tuning. The International Society of Measurement and Control, 1995.
Åström, K.J. and B. Wittenmark, Computer Controlled Systems–Theory and Design, 1984 Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984. 7632.
Balaban, A.T., Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation by Warren D. Seider, JD Seader, and Daniel R. Lewin. Wiley: New York. 1999. 824 pp. ISBN 0-471-24312-4. $99.95. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 3, p. 882–883, 2000.
Camacho, E.F., et al., Model predictive controllers. Springer, 2007.
Cutler, C.R. and B.L. Ramaker. Dynamic matrix control?? A computer control algorithm. in joint automatic control conference. 1980.
Dole, V. and B. Linnhoff, Distillation column targets. Computers & chemical engineering, Vol. 17, No. 5–6, p. 549–560, 1993.
Downs, J.J. and E.F. Vogel, A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Computers & chemical engineering, Vol. 17, No. 3, p. 245–255, 1993.
Edgar, T.F., D.M. Himmelblau, and L.S. Lasdon, Optimization of chemical processes. (No Title), 2001.
Gustavsson, I., Maximum likelihood identification of dynamics of the Ågesta reactor and comparison with results of spectral analysis. 1969.
Harmsen, G.J., Reactive distillation: The front-runner of industrial process intensification: A full review of commercial applications, research, scale-up, design and operation. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, Vol. 46, No. 9, p. 774–780, 2007.
Hershkowitz, F. and J.W. Frederick, Controlled combustion for regenerative reactors. Google Patents, 2010.
Holland, C.D. and A.I. Liapis, Computer methods for solving dynamic separation problems. (No Title), 1983.
Jacobsen, E.W. and S. Skogestad, Multiple steady states in ideal two‐product distillation. AIChE Journal, Vol. 37, No. 4, p. 499–511, 1991.
King, M., Process control: a practical approach. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
Kister, H.Z., et al., Distillation design. Vol. 1. McGraw-Hill New York, 1992.
Levenspiel, O., Chemical reaction engineering. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
Liu, Z., et al., Thermodynamics fundamentals and energy efficiency for the separation and high-valued utilization of Fischer–Tropsch heavy oil. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, Vol. 9, No. 1, p. 57, 2022.
Luyben, M.L., B.D. Tyreus, and W.L. Luyben, Plantwide control design procedure. AICHE journal, Vol. 43, No. 12, p. 3161–3174, 1997.
Luyben, W.L., Process modeling, simulation and control for chemical engineers. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 1989.
Marlin, T.E., Process control: designing processes and control systems for dynamic performance. (No Title), 1995.
Ogata, K., Discrete-time control systems. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1995.
Perry, J.H., Chemical engineers’ handbook. ACS Publications, 1950.
Qin, S.J. and T.A. Badgwell. An overview of industrial model predictive control technology. in AICHE symposium series. New York, NY: American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1971–c2002, 1997.
Ramirez-Marquez, C., et al., Dynamic behavior of the intensified alternative configurations for quaternary distillation. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, Vol. 108, p. 151–163, 2016.
Riquelme, O.A.B., Modeling and Computer Control of a Flotation Cell. The University of Utah, 1982.
Roffel, B. and B. Betlem, Process dynamics and control: modeling for control and prediction. John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
Safdarnejad, S.M., J.F. Tuttle, and K.M. Powell, Development of a roadmap for dynamic process intensification by using a dynamic, data-driven optimization approach. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, Vol. 140, p. 100–113, 2019.
Seborg, D.E., et al., Process dynamics and control. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
Shinskey, F.G., Process control systems. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1979.
Silveston, P., R.R. Hudgins, and A. Renken, Periodic operation of catalytic reactors—introduction and overview. Catalysis Today, Vol. 25, No. 2, p. 91–112, 1995.
Skogestad, S. and I. Postlethwaite, Multivariable feedback control: analysis and design. john Wiley & sons, 2005.
Smith, R., Chemical process: design and integration. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
Stephanopoulos, G., Chemical process control. Vol. 2. Prentice hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
Tian, Y., et al., An overview of process systems engineering approaches for process intensification: State of the art. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, Vol. 133, p. 160–210, 2018.
Wellstead, P. and J. Edmunds, Least-squares identification of closed-loop systems. International Journal of Control, Vol. 21, No. 4, p. 689–699, 1975.
Yan, L., et al., Static and dynamic intensification of water–ethylene glycol separation using a dividing wall column. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 60, No. 7, p. 3027–3037, 2021.
Yan, L., T.F. Edgar, and M. Baldea, Dynamic process intensification of binary distillation via periodic operation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 58, No. 15, p. 5830–5837, 2018
Yan, L., T.F. Edgar, and M. Baldea, Dynamic process intensification of binary distillation based on output multiplicity. AIChE Journal, Vol. 65, No. 4, p. 1162–1172, 2019.
Zhang, R., A. Xue, and F. Gao, Model predictive control. Springer, 2019.

  • Receive Date 22 July 2024
  • Revise Date 10 October 2024
  • Accept Date 19 January 2025