The Effect of PMBOK Knowledge Areas on Critical Success Factors in Oil and Gas Projects in Iran: A SEM Modeling

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Energy Economics and Management, Petroleum University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 M.S. Student, Department of Energy Economics and Management, Petroleum University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
The complicated nature of oil and gas projects demands the deployment of integrated and effective project management methodologies to achieve the project objectives, including the scope, cost, and timing of the project. However, the availability of alternative methods such as PMI/PMBOK, IPMA, and PRINCE2; high project failure rate; and limited resources can make decision-making challenging for project managers. Identification and ranking of the most critical factors in project management could be made through different methods, i.e., MCDM, regression analysis, or structural equation modeling, depending on the nature of the data and the purpose of the research. The primary purpose of this research is to provide insight into the effects of PMBOK’s 10 knowledge areas, including integration management, scope management, time management, cost management, quality management, human resources management, communication management, risk management, procurement management, and stakeholder management on critical success factors in Iran’s oil and gas industry. PMBOK knowledge areas were measured through the project management planning quality (PMPQ) survey, and the dependent variables, which were critical success factors, were operationalized through the project implementation profile (PIP) questionnaire. A total of 100 questionnaires were distributed among project managers, senior managers, and project experts in oil and gas organizations in Iran, and 72 acceptable responses were received and analyzed through structural equation modeling (SEM). The model was statistically significant and accounted for 33.7 % of the variation of CSFs. The standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) value of the modified model was 0.098, so the model fitting was appropriate. The overall positive relationship between the variables was also observed. The results of SEM analysis indicated that scope management was the most practical knowledge area with a weight equal to 0.855, followed by communication management and risk management with weights equal to 0.818 and 0.756, respectively.  

Highlights

  • It is almost impossible for project managers to focus on all knowledge areas equally; they must be aware of which knowledge areas come first.
  • PMBOK knowledge areas significantly influence critical success factors in oil and gas projects.
  • The scope management is the most practical knowledge area.

Keywords

Subjects

Abu-Hussein, R., Hyassat, M., Sweis, R., Alawneh, A., and Al-Debei, M. Project management factors affecting the enterprise resource planning projects’ performance in Jordan. Journal of Systems and Information Technology,  Vol. 18, No. 3, p.  230-254, 2016.
Besner, C. and Hobbs, B. The perceived value and potential contribution of project management practices to project success. Project Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp.37-48, 2006.
Hanisch, B., Lindner, F., Mueller, A. and Wald, A. Knowledge management in project environments. Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13, No. 4, p. 148-160, 2009.
Jitpaiboon, T., Smith, S.M. and Gu, Q. Critical success factors affecting project performance: An analysis of tools, practices, and managerial support. Project Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 3, p. 271-287, 2019.
Kukah, A.S.K., Owusu-Manu, D.G., Badu, E. and Edwards, D.J. Delphi study for evaluating critical success factors (CSFs) for PPP power projects in Ghana. Journal of Facilities Management, Vol. 22, No. 5, p. 828-848, 2022.
Maryman, V. The relationship between PMI PMBOK® guide's nine project knowledge areas and project success: An investigation of manufacturing information technology projects. Ph.D. thesis, Capella University, 2011
MinarroViseras, E., Baines, T. and Sweeney, M. Key success factors when implementing strategic manufacturing initiatives. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 25, No. 2, p. 151-179, 2005.
Molwus, J.J., Erdogan, B. and Ogunlana, S. Using structural equation modelling (SEM) to understand the relationships among critical success factors (CSFs) for stakeholder management in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 24, No. 3, p. 426-450, 2017.
Ochieng, E.G., Ovbagbedia, O.O., Zuofa, T., Abdulai, R., Matipa, W., Ruan, X. and Oledinma, A. Utilising a systematic knowledge management based system to optimise project management operations in oil and gas organisations. Information Technology & People, Vol. 31, No. 2, p. 527-556, 2018.
Patanakul, P., Iewwongcharoen, B. and Milosevic, D. An empirical study on the use of project management tools and techniques across project life-cycle and their impact on project success. Journal of General Management, Vol. 35, No. 3, p. 41-66, 2010.
Pinto, J.K. and Slevin, D.P. Project implementation profile. Xicom, 1992
Skinner, A. Investigating Information System Development, Behavior and Business Knowledge Impact on Project Success: Quantitative Analysis, Ph.D. thesis, Capella University, 2018.
White, D. and Fortune, J. The project‐specific Formal System Model. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 36-52, 2009.
Wang, T., Xu, J., He, Q., Chan, A.P. and Owusu, E.K. Studies on the success criteria and critical success factors for mega infrastructure construction projects: a literature review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. Vol. 30, No. 5, p. 1809-1834, 2022.
Zwikael, O. and Globerson, S. From critical success factors to critical success processes. International journal of Production Research, Vol. 44, No. 17, p. 3433-3449, 2006.
Zwikael, O. The relative importance of the PMBOK® Guide's nine Knowledge Areas during project planning. Project Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 4, p. 94-103, 2009.

  • Receive Date 16 January 2023
  • Revise Date 28 February 2023
  • Accept Date 20 February 2023