Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.S. Student, Put-Gas Company, Sistan and Balochestan, Iran

2 M.S. Student, Razi University-Gas Company, Kermanshah, Iran

3 M.S. Student, Sistan and Balochestan-Gas Company, Sistan and Balochestan, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Petroleum University of Technology, Abadan, Iran

Abstract

Every day’s large amount of gas is consumed which is transported through pipelines. Due to irreparable consequences of gas related accident and their heavy financial losses; therefore, the safety of pipeline is one of the priorities of gas companies, government and consumers. Hazard is part of every human endeavor, so hazard identification and risk management is very important. As some of event may not be exactly predictable, the study of risk is very important. The risk management is a determinative step of the health, safety and environmental management system (HSEMS). In this study performance of Hazard and operability (HAZOP) method for asses of hazards and risks, for all process, that present in Kermanshah Province Gas Company was evaluated. There are different risk analysis techniques. As the HAZOP is Process Hazard Analysis that not only identifies system hazards, but also determines their probability of occurrence by the effects of any deviations from design conditions and it gives us the accurate results, it’s used for risk assessment in this project. This research was conducted by a team of 3 experts and identified the process hazards by means of quid words. At the end of this study in Kermanshah Province Gas Company’s about 282 risks were identified and only 03 risk is unacceptable e and 111 are Conditional that must be eliminated without delay , the others are acceptable that the risk must be eliminated but it is not an emergency

Highlights

  • The safety of pipeline is one of the priorities of gas companies, government and consumers.
  • In this study performance of Hazard and operability (HAZOP) method for asses of hazards and risks, for all process
  • This research was conducted by a team of 3 experts and identified the process hazards by means of quid words
  • 282 risks were identified and only 03 risk is unacceptable e and 111 are Conditional that must be eliminated without delay, the others are acceptable that the risk must be eliminated but it is not an emergency.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Sotic, A, Rajic, R., the review of the definition of risk, Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, Vol.3, No. 3, P. 17–26, 2015.
Kaplan, S., John Garrick, B., on the quantitate definition of risk, Journal of risk analysis, Vol. 1, 1980.
 Crocker, K., and Snow, A., The theory of risk classification, hand book, JEL: D82, G22.
Kotek, L, Tabas, M., Hazop study with qualitative risk analysis for prioritization of corrective and preventive actions, Journal of Procedia engineering, Vol.42, 2012.
ISHTEYAQUE, S., JABEEN, S., ABRO, S. H., GHANI, A. A., SIKANDAR, S., SAIM, Q., Hazard and Operability Study of Gas Exploration Field Located in Pakistan, Journal of Sindh university research, Vol. 51, No. 2, P. 189-194, 2019.
Askarian, A., Jafari, M., J., Omidi, L., Miri Lavasani, M., R., Taghavi, L., Ashori, A., Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment in Two Gas Refinery Units, Journal of Health Scope, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2018.
Srinivasan R, Venkatasubramanian V. Automating HAZOP analysis of batch chemical plants. Journal of Chem Eng, Vol. 22, No. 9, P. 1345-55, 1998.
Dunjó, J., Fthenakis, V., Darbra, R.M., Vílchez, J.A., Arnaldos, J. Conducting HAZOPs in continuous chemical processes: Part II. A new model for estimating HAZOP time and a standardized approach for examining nodes.  Journal of Process Safety Environ, Vol. 89, No. 4, P. 224–233, 2011.
Gould, J., review of hazard identification techniques, an agency of the Health and Safety Executive.
National petrochemical company, HSE-MS setup guides, HAZOP guides, 2009.
 Nolan, D., P.,   Application of HAZOP and What-if Safety Reviews to the Petroleum, Petrochemical and Chemical Industries, Noyes Publications, New Jersey, 1994.
Musyafa, A, Hardika, A, Hazard and Operability study in Boiler System of the Steam Power Plant, IEESE International Journal of Science and Technology (IJSTE), Vol. 1, No. 3, P. 1-10, 2012.
Freeman, R. A., R. Lee, T. P. McNamara, Plan HAZOP studies with an expert system, Chemical
Engineering Progress, Vol. 88, No. 8, P. 28–32, 1992.
Jordi D., V. Fthenakisb, J. Arnaldos, Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 173, P. 19–32, 2010.
Rossing, N. L., M. Lind, N. Jensen, S. B. Jørgensen, A Goal-based methodology for HAZOP analysis, International Journal of Nuclear Safety and Simulation, Vol. 1, No. 2, P. 134-142, 2010.
Ramzan, N., F. Compart, and W. Witt, Methodology for the generation and evaluation of safety
system alternatives based on extended HAZOP. Process, journal of safety Progress, Vol. 26, No.1, P. 35–42, 2007.